<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PMA Media Group&#187; Add new tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmamediagroup.com/tag/add-new-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmamediagroup.com</link>
	<description>Unique Marketing Techniques and Strategies with Guaranteed Results!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:14:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Test?</title>
		<link>http://www.pmamediagroup.com/2009/06/why-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pmamediagroup.com/2009/06/why-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fugufish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cucumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rspec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmamediagroup.com/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I come to PMA from a large corporation over 40,000 employees strong, including an entire army of QA Engineers testing every change and release we made, something we took full advantage of. At first, I was of the opinion (as many BDD converts) that the process of defining the and testing the code before actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I come to PMA from a large corporation over 40,000 employees strong, including an entire army of QA Engineers testing every change and release we made, something we took full advantage of. At first, I was of the opinion (as many BDD converts) that the process of defining the and testing the code before actually writing the code would slow me down. As I moved more and more to BDD however, I found that I was completing tasks faster. The time saved comes from the ability to define how you expect your application to work. By doing this you will find that your actual code requires much less debugging. Things just seem to work. It continuously surprises me using BDD that things just work, so instead of spending hours looking for a mistyped association, I can spend those hours in actually coding.</p>
<p>Even with an army of QA Engineers, some bugs will sneak through. QA time on untested code takes longer, and debugging the code even longer than that. The release process can go from a day to several days, or even weeks.</p>
<p>With BDD, when new features are added to the application, it as easy as running your spec or test suite to ensure that the original functionality is undamaged. It of course seems like a no brainer to me now. It&#8217;s like looking back and remembering when you thought the world was flat, and seeing how narrow minded you were. The moral of the story? Test before you code! You fill find yourself with more time, and less headaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pmamediagroup.com/2009/06/why-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.pmamediagroup.com @ 2010-09-06 15:23:54 -->